A London court hears how former Nigerian oil minister Diezani Alison-Madueke allegedly funded a lavish lifestyle in the UK using bribes from oil industry figures. The trial reveals extravagant shopping, luxury homes, and secret payments.

---

London Trial Lifts the Veil on Alleged Luxury Empire of Former Nigerian Oil Minister

A courtroom in Southwark, London, has become the stage for one of the most dramatic corruption trials involving a former African cabinet minister. Prosecutors allege that Diezani Alison-Madueke, Nigeria’s minister of petroleum resources from 2010 to 2015, lived “a life of luxury in the United Kingdom” funded not by her salary, but by bribes from businessmen seeking influence over Nigeria’s vast oil industry.

The 65-year-old former minister denies five counts of accepting bribes and one charge of conspiracy to commit bribery. But the evidence being laid before the jury paints a vivid picture of extravagant spending, secret benefactors, and a lifestyle far removed from the realities faced by ordinary Nigerians.

According to the prosecution, Alison-Madueke’s years in office coincided with a period when oil contracts and licences were worth billions. Industry insiders, it is alleged, paid for her comfort and indulgence in exchange for access and favourable treatment.

One of the most striking episodes presented in court involves a visit to Harrods in November 2013. Jurors heard that Alison-Madueke arrived accompanied by Nigerian businessman Kolawole Aluko and a security guard. A sales executive recalled that the minister looked “extremely glamorous” and was dressed in visibly expensive clothing.

During that visit, prosecutors say, she ordered thousands of pounds’ worth of luxury goods, including rugs from high-end designer Alexander McQueen. She did not pay. Instead, the bill was allegedly settled by Aluko.

That pattern, the court heard, repeated itself across some of London’s most exclusive stores.

At a decorative arts and furniture shop in north London, Alison-Madueke was known under the alias “Sharon D.” Between October 2012 and November 2013, Aluko is said to have bought lamps, tables, and other items costing more than £370,000 on her behalf.

At Thomas Goode, a renowned Mayfair china and silverware shop, staff remembered her spending hours browsing. One employee recalled her laughing during a sale and saying: “I don’t even know why I’m buying this, I haven’t got the room for it.”

Items were often purchased and never collected. Alison-Madueke, prosecutors say, never paid for anything herself.

Instead, the money came from businessmen who owned or controlled energy companies that benefited from lucrative contracts with Nigeria’s state-owned oil corporation while she was minister.

Homes, Jets, and Cash Deliveries

The alleged benefits went far beyond shopping trips.

The court heard of luxury furniture shipped from a high-end store in Houston, Texas, to multiple London properties said to be used by Alison-Madueke. Two of these homes were reportedly purchased by another Nigerian businessman, Benedict Peters.

Jurors were shown photographs of interiors filled with expensive furnishings said to have been bought for the former minister. In one telling detail, Alison-Madueke’s driver recalled collecting her—and then-President Goodluck Jonathan—from the same London address.

Other expenses attributed to her benefactors include £89,410 to charter a private jet from Luton to Lagos in January 2012.

In another episode, a driver employed by Aluko allegedly collected £100,000 in cash from a north London bank and delivered it to a nearby flat where Alison-Madueke was living, rent-free, at Aluko’s expense.

Prosecutors argue that these were not gestures of friendship. They were bribes.

The Recorded Conversations

Perhaps most damaging are recorded conversations recovered from Alison-Madueke’s phone after it was seized during police searches in 2015.

The jury heard extracts from calls in which she allegedly confronted Aluko after learning he had spoken openly about the gifts he had given her. Their relationship, by that point, was deteriorating.

In a conversation from May 2014, Alison-Madueke is said to have expressed fury, referencing how she and others had “stuck our necks out” in negotiations over oil mining leases.

“I will be happy to escort all of you to jail along with myself,” she is alleged to have said. “You’ll be shocked what I will do. I will come out and tell the Nigerian people this is what happened.”

She continued: “Oh yes, I will blame myself… I will come out openly and say it so that they can judge me openly. And then all of us go and sit on the gate, let us see who survived.”

To prosecutors, these words reveal a relationship built on shared risk and mutual benefit—a web of influence, money, and power.

Others in the Dock

Alison-Madueke is not alone on trial.

Industry executive Olatimbo Ayinde, 54, faces one count of bribery relating to Alison-Madueke and a separate charge of bribing a foreign public official. Alison-Madueke’s brother, former bishop Doye Agama, 69, is charged with conspiracy to commit bribery.

All deny the allegations.

The trial is ongoing, and no verdict has yet been reached.

A Wider Reckoning

Beyond the courtroom, the case resonates deeply in Nigeria and across Africa. For many citizens, it symbolises the gulf between those entrusted with managing national wealth and the populations who rarely see its benefits.

Nigeria’s oil sector has long been a source of both immense revenue and persistent controversy. Billions flow through contracts and licences, yet millions remain in poverty. Allegations that a senior minister used her position to secure a life of opulence abroad strike at the heart of public trust.

What makes this trial particularly significant is that it is taking place in a foreign court. It reflects a growing willingness by international systems to scrutinise and prosecute alleged corruption tied to global financial networks.

Whether Alison-Madueke is ultimately convicted or acquitted, the proceedings have already pulled back the curtain on how power can be translated into privilege—and how those privileges can be hidden far from home.

For Nigerians watching from afar, the case is more than a legal drama. It is a mirror held up to a system that has too often allowed wealth meant for national development to be diverted into private luxury.

As the trial continues, it promises not only to determine individual guilt or innocence, but to reignite a broader conversation about accountability, governance, and the true cost of corruption.